You need Javascript enabled for this to workAssisted living and special populations: What do we know about differences in use and potential access barriers?
Logo for Center for Personal Assistance Services New Browser Window, University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over main navigation bar to the sub navigation barHome (press control H in some browsers)Current directory is Need for PAS (press control N in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)Workers and Caregivers (press control W in some browsers)Economics and Workplace PAS (press control E in some browsers)Emergency Preparedness (press control P in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers) 
Jump over the sub navigation bar to the main body content





  Jump over the main body content to the main navigation bar
 

Printer-friendly page

Hernandez, M. & Newcomer, R. (2007). Assisted living and special populations: What do we know about differences in use and potential access barriers? Gerontologist, 47(3), pp.110-117.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to review existing knowledge about assisted living (AL) use by traditionally underserved populations, including people of color, low-income people, and those living in rural communities.

Design and Methods: We reviewed methodologies and findings of research on AL and residential care up to June 2004.

Results: Some studies suggested that low-income people and people of color either are less likely to utilize AL or receive AL in settings with less space and amenities and/or lower scores in selected quality measures. Generalizations from national or multistate studies to the population have methodological limitations. Numerous topics remain unstudied, including the pricing of AL, the experience of choosing an AL facility, the presence of discriminatory admission and retention practices, and the role of resident preferences. Data on access to AL in rural areas are inconclusive.

Implications: We offer recommendations for national surveys to better classify supportive housing settings. Furthermore, we suggest quantitative and qualitative studies to illuminate the experience of low-income, racial/ethnic minority, and rural populations in AL settings (abstract from: http://gerontologist.gerontologyjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/47/suppl_1/110?maxtoshow=&HITS;=10&hits;=10&RESULTFORMAT;=&author1;=Newcomer%2C+R&andorexacttitle;=and&andorexacttitleabs;=and&andorexactfulltext;=and&searchid;=1&FIRSTINDEX;=0&sortspec;=relevance&resourcetype;=HWCIT).

Obtain the Full Version