You need Javascript enabled for this to work
Logo for Center for Personal Assistance Services New Browser Window, University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over main navigation bar to the sub navigation barHome (press control H in some browsers)Current directory is Need for PAS (press control N in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)Workers and Caregivers (press control W in some browsers)Economics and Workplace PAS (press control E in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers) 
Jump over the sub navigation bar to the main body content

State Information

Institutional Services

All Center Information by Audience

PAS Center Publications

Library

Center Presentations

Links

Webcasts

Policy & Legislation

Health Care Reform

State of the Science Conference

Center Newsletter

PAS Events Calendar

Center News Items

About the Center

 PHI

  Jump over the main body content to the main navigation bar 		 

Printer-friendly page

LaPlante, M.P. (2010). The classic measure of disability in activities of daily living is biased by age but an expanded IADL/ADL measure is not. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 10.1093/geronb/gbp129

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate, by age, the performance of 2 disability measures based on needing help: one using 5 classic activities of daily living (ADL) and another using an expanded set of 14 activities including instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), walking, getting outside, and ADL (IADL/ADL).

Methods. Guttman and item response theory (IRT) scaling methods are used with a large (N = 25,470) nationally representative household survey of individuals aged 18 years and older.

Results. Guttman scalability of the ADL items increases steadily with age, reaching a high level at ages 75 years and older. That is reflected in an IRT model by age-related differential item functioning (DIF) resulting in age-biased measurement of ADL. Guttman scalability of the IADL/ADL items also increases with age but is lower than the ADL. Although age-related DIF also occurs with IADL/ADL items, DIF is lower in magnitude and balances out without causing age bias.

Discussion. An IADL/ADL scale measuring need for help is hierarchical, unidimensional, and unbiased by age. It has greater content validity for measuring need for help in the community and shows greater sensitivity by age than the classic ADL measure. As demand for community services is increasing among adults of all ages, an expanded IADL/ADL measure is more useful than ADL. (abstract from: http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/gbp129).

Obtain the Full Version

Subscription information available here:
http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/gbp129?eaf