You need Javascript enabled for this to workOhio Olmstead Cases, 2009
Logo for Center for Personal Assistance Services New Browser Window, University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over main navigation bar to the sub navigation barHome (press control H in some browsers)Current directory is Need for PAS (press control N in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)Workers and Caregivers (press control W in some browsers)Economics and Workplace PAS (press control E in some browsers)Emergency Preparedness (press control P in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers) 
Jump over the sub navigation bar to the main body content
Jump over the main body content to the main navigation bar
 

Printer-friendly page

map of

Ohio Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases, 2009

May 2009

The Center for PAS has tracked 2 Olmstead related case(s) in Ohio.

This information is extracted from the "Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits" table in the "Introduction to Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans" report published on the center for PAS website.

Martin et al v. Taft et al

Date filed: 1989

Case status: Closed (2008)

Primary Target group: MR/DDa

Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Olmstead

Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OH12 3 23

Case Summary & Links to Further Detailsiii:

Summary Complaint that state failed to provide integrated residential services to all eligible people with developmental disabilities and waiver wait list was not moving at a reasonable pace.
Progress Case dismissed.

Nickolaus Thompson & OH Provider Resource Association et al v. Hayes et al

Date filed: Jun. 2003

Case status: Closed (Sep 2003)

Primary Target group: MR/DDa

Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related

Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : OH23

Case Summary & Links to Further Detailsiii:

Summary Case (brought by private providers of services for people with developmental disabilities) alleging the state is not ensuring that Medicaid services are administered uniformly across counties.
Progress Court ordered providers to either make new, mutual contracts or continue to operate under existing contracts until agreement was reached. CMS was asked to give technical assistance to facilitate the change in contracting rules.

Select from Map
Button: Map of the 50 US states. Choose another state for page.
OR
Select from List