![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
|
SummaryIn the following opinion piece in Newsday, former New York City mayor Ed Koch and former chief of staff of the House Committee on Aging Robert Weiner argue for restoring home health care funding.
-------------------- Congress must restore funds for home health care -------------------- BY EDWARD I. KOCH AND ROBERT S. WEINER July 6, 2007 As the health care debate takes off in the presidential campaign and in Congress, let's not ignore the silent sadness of growing numbers of elderly being forced unnecessarily into nursing homes. In the last seven years, while the Medicare budget for nursing home stays has dramatically increased from $13.6 billion to $15.7 billion, home health care has been cut by 25 percent, from $14 billion to $10.5 billion. It is cut further in the Bush administration's proposed fiscal year 2008 budget, which calls for an "inflation freeze" that would slash $410 million in fiscal 2008 and $9.68 billion over five years. New York would be one of the five states hit hardest, losing $567 million in aid for home health care during that period. None of this makes common sense. Home care allows the elderly who have become frail to maintain their dignity and independence, sleep in their own beds, use their own kitchens and stay in the house they have long enjoyed (or in the house of a child or relative) - unless their condition deteriorates to the point where moving into an institution is absolutely necessary. Many of us have or have had older grandparents, parents, other relatives or friends living in nursing homes. In nearly every case, the elderly person did not want to go; many cried over it. Besides offering a higher quality of life, home care is far cheaper than the alternatives - averaging one-fifth the price of nursing homes and a tiny fraction (3 percent) of the cost of hospitalization. It costs roughly $109 per visit, compared to $499 per day in a skilled nursing facility and $3,838 for hospitalization, according to Medicare statistics. In the 1970s, together with House Committee on Aging chairman Claude Pepper, we worked to pass federal legislation that eliminated the visit limit for home care under Medicare and required home health inclusion in Medicaid. Unfortunately, in the last decade the national policy was reversed. Starting in 1997, under the Balanced Budget Act, Medicare home health spending was cut by half. This forced the closing of nearly 25 percent of all home health agencies in the United States. The last seven years have added insult to injury. The National Association for Home Care and Hospice president, Val Halamandaris, former senior counsel to the House Committee on Aging and a man who has devoted his life to this issue, is right that cuts in home care "cut away at the American public's hope for an effective national health care solution." Congress has decided to transfer limited funds to other priorities such as nursing homes, physicians' fees and children's health. The reason? Home health care, which is offered by small agencies that send nurses, physical therapists, speech pathologists, homemakers and social workers into people's homes, doesn't have nearly the lobbying power of big institutions like the nursing home industry and the hospitals. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, "hospitals / nursing homes" gave more than $30 million to candidates in the 2004- 2006 federal election cycles, based on Federal Election Commission data, and they are among the top third of 80 "industries" ranked. Home health does not even rate a mention on the chart. Many in today's workforce will live well beyond the expected limits of past generations. More than 20 million seniors 85 and older will populate the United States by the year 2050, compared to 3 million at the beginning of the new millennium. In 1900, fewer than 5 million Americans reached the age of 65. Now, that figure is 40 million. There are some 1.6 million people in nursing homes today. Sometimes, senior citizens are able to live normal lives and care for themselves, but as people age, many have problems compounded by poor health and need caretakers. They should not be forced into nursing homes for lack of alternatives. The new Democratic Congress needs to restore the priority of home health care for senior citizens. Edward I. Koch, left, is a former mayor of New York City and member of Congress. Robert S. Weiner is a former chief of staff of the House Committee on Aging and was legislative assistant to Koch. Copyright (c) 2007, Newsday, Inc. -------------------- This article originally appeared at: http://www.newsday.com/news/printedition/opinion/ny-opkoc065282430jul06,0,6736556.story?coll=ny-opinion-print Visit Newsday online at http://www.newsday.com.
|