In a landmark interpretation of the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act), the Supreme Court decided that people with disabilities have a right to receive care in the most integrated setting appropriate and that unnecessary institutionalization violates the ADA. All states must now comply with the decision. The Center for PAS is tracking the legal and policy ramifications of the Olmstead decision in each state.

• Introduction to Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans
• Table: State Olmstead Plans and Alternative Strategies
• Table: Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits by State

(Data below extracted from the Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans report, the State Olmstead Plans and Alternative Strategies table and the Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits table available at the links above.)

Alaska State Olmstead Planⁱⁱ
As of August, 2009

Alaska does not currently have an Olmstead planⁱⁱ developed. Alaska has, however, developed an alternative strategy to comply entitled:
Moving Forward: Comprehensive Integrated Mental Health Plan: 2006-2011, published April 2006, revised March 2007

Further Informationⁱⁱⁱ:

Report:
[http://hss.state.ak.us/dph/healthplanning/movingforward/assets/CompPlan_03-2007.pdf]

Notes and References: AK¹²

Alaska Legal Cases Related to Olmstead
As of August, 2009

The Center for PAS has tracked 2 Olmstead and Olmstead related legal cases in Alaska.

• Information and summaries of each case.