Center for Personal Assistance Services University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over persistant main navigation to the sub navigationHome (press control H in some browsers)Formal and Informal PAS (press control F in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)PAS Workforce (press control W in some browsers)Workplace PAS (press control O in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers)  
Jump over the changing body navigation to the persistant top navigation

Printer-friendly page

State Information > North Carolina Olmstead Decision Information> North Carolina Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases

North Carolina Olmstead and Olmstead Related Cases map of North Carolina

As of January 2005

The Center for PAS has tracked 2 Olmstead related cases in North Carolina.

This information is extracted from the "Olmstead and Olmstead-Related Lawsuits" table in the "Introduction to Olmstead Lawsuits and Olmstead Plans" report published on the center for PAS website.

Thomas S. v. Flaherty *

Date filed: n/aii
Case status: Closed (1990)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : NC111
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Class action (brought under the 14th Amendment, not the ADA or Rehabilitation Act) concerning people institutionalized in state psychiatric facilities. Appeal Court held that institutionalized persons with disabilities are entitled to services that are consistent with professional opinion & where it is assessed as appropriate, people are entitled to receive community-based services.

McCree v. Odom (previously Antrican v. Odom) *

Date filed: n/aii
Case status: Closed (May 20029)
Primary Target group:
Case Type (Olmstead e or Related f): Related
Reference (on the Olmstead & Olmstead-related Lawsuits table) : NC23
Case Summary & Links to Further Details iii:
Summary Class action on behalf of Medicaid-eligible children unable to obtain dental services due to a lack of Medicaid-participating dentists. The ruling in this case was one of the first that held that states cannot claim 'sovereign immunity' & that complainants have individually enforceable rights under Medicaid law. Progress Complaint upheld.

Select from Map
Button: Map of the 50 US states. Choose another state for page.
OR
Select from List