You need Javascript enabled for this to workPerspectives on benefits and costs of work from individuals with psychiatric disabilities.
Logo for Center for Personal Assistance Services New Browser Window, University of California, San Francisco  
Jump over main navigation bar to the sub navigation barHome (press control H in some browsers)Current directory is Need for PAS (press control N in some browsers)Home and Community PAS (press control C in some browsers)Workers and Caregivers (press control W in some browsers)Economics and Workplace PAS (press control E in some browsers)Emergency Preparedness (press control P in some browsers)PAS Users (press control U in some browsers) 
Jump over the sub navigation bar to the main body content

State Information

Institutional Services

All Center Information by Audience

PAS Center Publications

Library

Center Presentations

Links

Webcasts

Policy & Legislation

Health Care Reform

State of the Science Conference

Center Newsletter

PAS Events Calendar

Center News Items

About the Center

 PHI

  Jump over the main body content to the main navigation bar 		 

Printer-friendly page

Larson, J. E.; Barr, L. K.; Corrigan, P. W.; Kuwabara, S. A.; Boyle, M. G.; Glenn, T. L. (2007). Perspectives on benefits and costs of work from individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26(2), pp.71-77.

Abstract

The goal of this qualitative study was to explore and present the perspectives of unemployed and employed individuals with psychiatric disabilities on the benefits and costs of work. The participants in this study were enrolled in a supported employment program that provided assistance in weighing the pros and cons of work, locating employment based on personal choice, and maintaining competitive jobs through unlimited support. At the 12th month of participation in the job program, 89 people completed the Stages of Change Interview for Seeking Competitive Employment. For 59 unemployed participants, results suggested 47 distinct themes that were categorized into 5 conceptual frameworks: financial, emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and interpersonal. For 30 employed participants, results suggested 25 distinct themes that were categorized into the same 5 conceptual frameworks. Implications for future research will be discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved)

Obtain the Full Version

Article available for purchase:
Published on the Web